Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Date
Msg-id 18908.1267067970@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)  (Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)  (Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>)
Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)  ("David E. Wheeler" <david.wheeler@pgexperts.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> writes:
> ISTM the easiest and safest fix would be to not allow recursive plperl
> creations.  You could still call plperl functions within functions,
> just not if they are not defined.  This limitation really blows

That's the understatement of the month.  What you're saying, IIUC, is
that if function A calls function B via a SPI command, and B wasn't
executed previously in the current session, it would fail?  Seems
entirely unacceptable.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Alex Hunsaker
Date:
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Next
From: Alex Hunsaker
Date:
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)