Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Alex Hunsaker
Subject Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Date
Msg-id 34d269d41002251308i290a18b0wa7b8e7dfc4aba4d4@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)  ("David E. Wheeler" <david.wheeler@pgexperts.com>)
Responses Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)  ("David E. Wheeler" <david.wheeler@pgexperts.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 14:06, David E. Wheeler
<david.wheeler@pgexperts.com> wrote:
> On Feb 25, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:
>> There is one fairly good answer:
>>
>> Use a perl that's compiled to support multiplicity but not threads.

> That solves the problem with recursion or with $a and $b or both?

Yes ATM because we only kick in the extra security if you are on
threads... Its a bit of a kludge in Safe.  I know Tim wants to rectify
that...

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)