Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Date
Msg-id 88666B29-6BCC-4615-B92A-4FE6A3E6C9AD@pgexperts.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)  (Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Feb 25, 2010, at 1:08 PM, Alex Hunsaker wrote:

>> That solves the problem with recursion or with $a and $b or both?
>
> Yes ATM because we only kick in the extra security if you are on
> threads... Its a bit of a kludge in Safe.  I know Tim wants to rectify
> that...

By adding the extra security when *not* under threads as well?

I find this all very confusing, frankly.

Best,

David

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Alex Hunsaker
Date:
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Next
From: Tim Bunce
Date:
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)