Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Date
Msg-id 14791.1267132011@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)  (Tim Bunce <Tim.Bunce@pobox.com>)
Responses Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)  (Tim Bunce <Tim.Bunce@pobox.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Tim Bunce <Tim.Bunce@pobox.com> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:04:44AM -0800, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>> There seem to be no good answers here.

> There is one fairly good answer:

> Use a perl that's compiled to support multiplicity but not threads.
> That avoids the sort bug and, as an extra bonus, gives plperl a
> significant speed boost.

[ scratches head... ] Why would threading have anything to do with the
security behavior imposed by Safe?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Next
From: Alex Hunsaker
Date:
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)