Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Date
Msg-id 610b42e081bd6ffe9cd5c161d0431b58@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)  (Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)  (Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


> Well that's the thing, probably by what I described below that. Namely
> get something working for 9.1 and after we know its good and solid see
> if we can back patch it.

Just don't break anything in 9.0 that relies on plperl please. :) To that
end, let me know when HEAD has something somewhat stable, and I'll
run some tests against it (e.g. Bucardo, which uses lots of plperl)

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201002251458
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkuG1qIACgkQvJuQZxSWSshX4gCgrEPDLc5GQFKF0zf0eEZv4wDv
Qt8AoOngHlVD+OXs26naSnqcrJl4xGFG
=Ec6y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5314: Error in nested composite types in plpgsql.
Next
From: Alex Hunsaker
Date:
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)