market - Search results
Mailing lists >> pgsql-advocacy >> Thread
2002-12-20 00:35:51 | Re: RedHat attitude (Jean-Michel POURE)
market offer? Do you think investors will say "OK, RHDB deserves to stay open-source
Mailing lists >> pgsql-advocacy >> Thread
2002-12-18 21:22:29 | Re: RedHat attitude (Alberto Caso)
marketing purposes should make us happy. [1] http:///software/database/ [2] http:///rhdb/ [3] http:///rhdb/images/rhdb2.png
Mailing lists >> pgsql-advocacy >> Thread
2002-12-16 18:59:54 | Re: RedHat attitude (Kevin Brown)
marketing it's the *only* perspective that counts. If the customer acquires RHDB, they'll think
Mailing lists >> pgsql-advocacy >> Thread
2002-12-16 17:43:04 | Re: RedHat attitude (Kevin Brown)
marketing PostgreSQL under a different name RedHat is making it more difficult for PostgreSQL to gain
Mailing lists >> pgsql-advocacy >> Thread
2002-12-16 09:08:41 | Re: RedHat attitude (Marc G. Fournier)
marketing to most likely don't even know is PostgreSQL, so won't even put two and two together
Mailing lists >> pgsql-advocacy >> Thread
2002-12-16 04:14:38 | Re: RedHat attitude (Jean-Michel POURE)
marketing efforts. My only concerns are that : 1) Changing PostgreSQL name to RedHat database is unfair
Mailing lists >> pgsql-advocacy >> Thread
2002-12-15 17:15:11 | Re: RedHat attitude (Gavin Sherry)
marketing the Red Hat Database will help PostgreSQL -- it increases the market for open source
Mailing lists >> pgsql-advocacy >> Thread
2002-12-15 07:22:17 | RedHat attitude (Jean-Michel POURE)
marketing staff. There are some signs that RedHat database marketing team is stupid : * RedHat database
Mailing lists >> pgsql-advocacy >> Thread
2002-12-14 15:40:01 | Re: Version Numbering (Marc G. Fournier)
marketing wind', so that if something does happen in the future that makes it politically
Mailing lists >> pgsql-advocacy >> Thread
2002-12-14 15:22:01 | Re: Version Numbering (Josh Berkus)
marketing reasons*. However, they are employing at least one full-time PostgreSQL hacker, and their
Mailing lists >> pgsql-advocacy >> Thread
2002-12-13 17:01:42 | Re: Version Numbering (Douglas Trainor)
marketing a renamed product? I looked at the license for pgAdmin II ( http:///pgadmin2.php?ContentID=2 ) and it don't see that
Mailing lists >> pgsql-advocacy >> Thread
2002-12-13 10:20:43 | Re: Version Numbering (Neil Conway)
marketing-oriented versioning to be annoying, the key point is that it's really not a good
Mailing lists >> pgsql-advocacy >> Thread
2002-12-13 10:17:04 | Re: Version Numbering (Jean-Michel POURE)
markets would-be features before implementation. SAP-DB says they have 100 developpers working, but in the real
Mailing lists >> pgsql-advocacy >> Thread
2002-12-13 10:12:44 | Re: Version Numbering (greg@turnstep.com)
marketing reasons is never going to get you anywhere in the Postgres community. I don't think
Mailing lists >> pgsql-advocacy >> Thread
2002-12-13 09:53:16 | Re: Version Numbering (Merlin Moncure)
Marketing concerns outweigh all other concerns when trying to make decisions about things which are visible