Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

5 November 2010

• 09:05   Re: Simple (hopefully) throughput question? Pierre C
• 10:59   Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences A B
• 11:16   Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences Thom Brown
• 11:17   Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences Thom Brown
• 11:17   Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences Guillaume Cottenceau
• 11:23   Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences Szymon Guz
• 11:24   Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences A B
• 11:27   Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences Craig Ringer
• 11:32   Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences A B
• 11:36   Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences A B
• 11:37   Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences Marti Raudsepp
• 11:42   Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences Thom Brown
• 11:56   Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences Marti Raudsepp
• 12:06   Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences Guillaume Cottenceau
• 12:08   Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences Guillaume Cottenceau
• 12:48   Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences Jon Nelson
• 15:23   Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences Devrim GÜNDÜZ
• 16:24   Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences Chris Browne
• 16:26   Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences Mladen Gogala
• 17:35   Re: Simple (hopefully) throughput question? Robert Klemme
• 20:15   Major Linux performance regression; shouldn't we be worried about RHEL6? Josh Berkus
• 20:19   Re: Major Linux performance regression; shouldn't we be worried about RHEL6? Josh Berkus
• 20:27   Re: Major Linux performance regression; shouldn't we be worried about RHEL6? Scott Marlowe
• 20:33   Re: Major Linux performance regression; shouldn't we be worried about RHEL6? Josh Berkus
• 20:39   Re: Major Linux performance regression; shouldn't we be worried about RHEL6? Andres Freund
• 20:58   Re: Bufer cache replacement LRU algorithm? Greg Smith
• 21:00   Re: Major Linux performance regression; shouldn't we be worried about RHEL6? Scott Marlowe
• 21:10   Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1? Greg Smith
• 21:22   Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1? Marti Raudsepp
• 21:25   Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1? Andres Freund
• 21:26   Re: Major Linux performance regression; shouldn't we be worried about RHEL6? Greg Smith
• 21:28   Re: Simple (hopefully) throughput question? Samuel Gendler
• 22:04   Re: Simple (hopefully) throughput question? Samuel Gendler
• 22:06   Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1? Greg Smith
• 22:07   Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1? Josh Berkus
• 22:11   Re: Major Linux performance regression; shouldn't we be worried about RHEL6? Josh Berkus
• 22:29   Re: Major Linux performance regression; shouldn't we be worried about RHEL6? Scott Carey
• 23:33   Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1? Marti Raudsepp
• 23:39   Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1? Pierre C