Re: Major Linux performance regression; shouldn't we be worried about RHEL6? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Major Linux performance regression; shouldn't we be worried about RHEL6?
Date
Msg-id 4CD469EC.4090702@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Major Linux performance regression; shouldn't we be worried about RHEL6?  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Major Linux performance regression; shouldn't we be worried about RHEL6?
List pgsql-performance
> Why would it be off limits?  Is it likely to lose data due to power failure etc?

If fsyncs are taking 5X as long, people can't use PostgreSQL on that
platform.

> Are you referring to improvements due to write barrier support getting
> fixed up fr ext4 to run faster but still be safe?  I would assume that
> any major patches that increase performance with write barriers
> without being dangerous for your data would get back ported by RH as
> usual.

Hopefully, yes.  I wouldn't mind confirmation of this, though; it
wouldn't be the first time RH shipped with known-bad IO performance.

--
                                  -- Josh Berkus
                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                                     http://www.pgexperts.com

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Major Linux performance regression; shouldn't we be worried about RHEL6?
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Major Linux performance regression; shouldn't we be worried about RHEL6?