Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

11 November 2010

• 02:47   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Robert Haas
• 04:14   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Mladen Gogala
• 07:01   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Віталій Тимчишин
• 07:43   Re: Why dose the planner select one bad scan plan. tv@fuzzy.cz
• 12:41   CREATE INDEX as bottleneck Marc Mamin
• 12:51   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Kenneth Marshall
• 12:58   Re: CREATE INDEX as bottleneck Kenneth Marshall
• 13:16   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Mladen Gogala
• 13:28   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Kenneth Marshall
• 14:00   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Kevin Grittner
• 16:06   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Bob Lunney
• 16:13   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Mladen Gogala
• 16:46   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Tom Lane
• 16:55   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Craig James
• 16:58   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Robert Haas
• 17:11   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Mladen Gogala
• 17:23   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Tom Lane
• 17:55   Re: CREATE INDEX as bottleneck Alex Hunsaker
• 17:58   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Tom Lane
• 18:02   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Robert Haas
• 18:05   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Robert Haas
• 18:16   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Kevin Grittner
• 18:17   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Tom Lane
• 18:23   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Kevin Grittner
• 18:36   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Tom Lane
• 18:41   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Tom Lane
• 18:48   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Kevin Grittner
• 18:50   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Kevin Grittner
• 19:05   Re: CREATE INDEX as bottleneck Marc Mamin
• 19:11   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Andres Freund
• 19:19   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Jon Nelson
• 19:29   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Robert Haas
• 19:56   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan 
• 20:28   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Kenneth Marshall
• 20:53   equivalent queries lead to different query plans for self-joins with group by? Ben
• 21:37   Re: equivalent queries lead to different query plans for self-joins with group by? Tom Lane
• 22:56   Re: equivalent queries lead to different query plans for self-joins with group by? Ben