Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

13 November 2010

• 02:32   Re: temporary tables, indexes, and query plans Jon Nelson
• 04:44   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Cédric Villemain
• 04:54   Re: MVCC performance issue Craig Ringer
• 06:05   Re: MVCC performance issue Rich
• 08:32   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Marc Mamin
• 12:53   do temporary tables have hint bits? Jon Nelson
• 13:57   Re: do temporary tables have hint bits? Tom Lane
• 14:41   Re: temporary tables, indexes, and query plans Tom Lane
• 15:15   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan bricklen
• 15:15   Re: temporary tables, indexes, and query plans Jon Nelson
• 15:42   Re: temporary tables, indexes, and query plans Tom Lane
• 16:38   Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1? Marti Raudsepp
• 17:02   Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1? Tom Lane
• 17:38   Re: MVCC performance issue Mladen Gogala
• 23:11   Re: MVCC performance issue Craig Ringer
• 23:20   Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan Robert Haas
• 23:46   Re: temporary tables, indexes, and query plans Robert Haas
• 23:54   Re: temporary tables, indexes, and query plans Tom Lane