Re: temporary tables, indexes, and query plans - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: temporary tables, indexes, and query plans
Date
Msg-id 25639.1289662872@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: temporary tables, indexes, and query plans  (Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql@jamponi.net>)
Responses Re: temporary tables, indexes, and query plans
Re: temporary tables, indexes, and query plans
List pgsql-performance
Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql@jamponi.net> writes:
> OK. This is a highly distilled example that shows the behavior.

> BEGIN;
> CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE foo AS SELECT x AS A, chr(x % 75 + 32) AS b,
> ''::text AS c from generate_series(1,500) AS x;
> UPDATE foo SET c = 'foo' WHERE b = 'A' ;
> CREATE INDEX foo_b_idx on foo (b);
> [ and the rest of the transaction can't use that index ]

OK, this is an artifact of the "HOT update" optimization.  Before
creating the index, you did updates on the table that would have been
executed differently if the index had existed.  When the index does get
created, its entries for those updates are incomplete, so the index
can't be used in transactions that could in principle see the unmodified
rows.

You could avoid this effect either by creating the index before you do
any updates on the table, or by not wrapping the entire process into a
single transaction.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: do temporary tables have hint bits?
Next
From: bricklen
Date:
Subject: Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan