Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

16 August 2018

• 00:03   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c David Steele
• 00:05   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane
• 00:09   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane
• 00:59   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andrew Dunstan
• 01:04   questions about the logical decoding implementation Jeff Davis
• 01:17   Re: Facility for detecting insecure object naming Bruce Momjian
• 01:18   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane
• 01:21   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andrew Dunstan
• 01:37   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c David Steele
• 01:57   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane
• 03:35   Re: questions about the logical decoding implementation Andres Freund
• 03:47   Re: Stored procedures and out parameters Peter Eisentraut
• 03:49   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund
• 03:52   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund
• 04:06   Re: Stored procedures and out parameters Tom Lane
• 04:13   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane
• 04:18   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane
• 04:23   Re: xact_start meaning when dealing with procedures? Jonathan S. Katz
• 04:24   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund
• 04:31   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane
• 04:40   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund
• 04:50   Re: Stored procedures and out parameters Shay Rojansky
• 04:54   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Thomas Munro
• 05:00   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane
• 05:06   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund
• 05:46   docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materialized views Dian Fay
• 06:14   Re: Documentaion fix. Michael Paquier
• 06:15   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane
• 06:24   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Thomas Munro
• 06:27   Re: Improve behavior of concurrent TRUNCATE Michael Paquier
• 07:03   Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materializedviews Michael Paquier
• 07:06   Re: xact_start meaning when dealing with procedures? Michael Paquier
• 07:06   Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materializedviews Jonathan S. Katz
• 07:15   Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materializedviews Michael Paquier
• 07:18   Update comment in errcodes.txt correctly Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan GCS Delivery)
• 07:44   Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materializedviews Dian Fay
• 07:44   Re: Facility for detecting insecure object naming Mark Dilger
• 08:08   Re: Improve behavior of concurrent TRUNCATE Alvaro Herrera
• 08:57   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Nico Williams
• 09:00   Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partitionwise join enabled. Etsuro Fujita
• 09:41   Re: Fix quadratic performance of regexp match/split functions Kaiting Chen
• 09:43   Re: Update comment in errcodes.txt correctly Michael Paquier
• 09:51   Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table Mathias Brossard
• 10:07   Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materialized views Tom Lane
• 10:27   Re: Facility for detecting insecure object naming Tom Lane
• 10:31   A slightly misleading comment in GetNewObjectId() Thomas Munro
• 10:36   RE: Update comment in errcodes.txt correctly Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan GCS Delivery)
• 10:47   Re: A slightly misleading comment in GetNewObjectId() Tom Lane
• 11:05   Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materializedviews Jonathan S. Katz
• 11:20   Re: Add a semicolon to query related to search_path Tatsuro Yamada
• 11:44   Re: Index Skip Scan Bhushan Uparkar
• 11:51   Re: Facility for detecting insecure object naming Noah Misch
• 11:55   Re: Fix quadratic performance of regexp match/split functions Andrew Gierth
• 11:56   Re: Facility for detecting insecure object naming Noah Misch
• 12:22   Re: Index Skip Scan Thomas Munro
• 13:45   Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table Pavel Stehule
• 13:54   Re: Update comment in errcodes.txt correctly Michael Paquier
• 14:22   executor relation handling Amit Langote
• 14:31   Re: remove ancient pre-dlopen dynloader code Andres Freund
• 14:41   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund
• 15:04   Fix help option of contrib/oid2name Tatsuro Yamada
• 16:40   Re: Fix help option of contrib/oid2name Laurenz Albe
• 16:53   Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). Alexander Korotkov
• 17:16   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: long transactions on hot standby feedback replica/ proof of concept Alexander Korotkov
• 17:18   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund
• 17:31   Logical decoding currently not usable for all due to lack ofLargeObject-support Andreas Joseph Krogh
• 17:36   How to estimate the shared memory size required for parallel scan? Masayuki Takahashi
• 17:38   Re: Logical decoding currently not usable for all due to lack ofLargeObject-support Andres Freund
• 17:44   Sv: Re: Logical decoding currently not usable for all due to lackof LargeObject-support Andreas Joseph Krogh
• 17:52   Re: pgbench's expression parsing & negative numbers Ibrar Ahmed
• 17:57   Re: Fix help option of contrib/oid2name Michael Paquier
• 18:24   Re: memory leak when serializing TRUNCATE in reorderbuffer Tomas Vondra
• 18:26   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Peter Eisentraut
• 18:28   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Peter Eisentraut
• 18:30   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund
• 18:54   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Peter Eisentraut
• 19:00   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund
• 19:22   Re: remove ancient pre-dlopen dynloader code Tom Lane
• 19:36   Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materializedviews Dian Fay
• 19:57   Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). Liudmila Mantrova
• 19:59   Re: remove ancient pre-dlopen dynloader code Andres Freund
• 20:07   Re: remove ancient pre-dlopen dynloader code Tom Lane
• 20:10   Re: remove ancient pre-dlopen dynloader code Andres Freund
• 20:22   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund
• 20:27   FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option Surafel Temesgen
• 20:34   Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option Andres Freund
• 20:52   Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option Andrew Gierth
• 20:54   Re: Facility for detecting insecure object naming Mark Dilger
• 21:07   Re: logical decoding / rewrite map vs. maxAllocatedDescs Tomas Vondra
• 21:28   Re: pgbench's expression parsing & negative numbers Fabien COELHO
• 21:30   Re: pgbench's expression parsing & negative numbers Andres Freund
• 21:36   Re: A slightly misleading comment in GetNewObjectId() Robert Haas
• 21:39   Re: Memory leak with CALL to Procedure with COMMIT. Peter Eisentraut
• 21:41   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane
• 22:01   Re: [sqlsmith] ERROR: partition missing from subplans Alvaro Herrera
• 22:05   Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c Andres Freund
• 22:36   Re: FailedAssertion on partprune Alvaro Herrera
• 22:37   Re: FailedAssertion on partprune Alvaro Herrera
• 22:46   Re: Memory leak with CALL to Procedure with COMMIT. Alvaro Herrera
• 22:49   Re: Stored procedures and out parameters Peter Eisentraut
• 23:02   Re: Stored procedures and out parameters Vladimir Sitnikov
• 23:08   Re: Stored procedures and out parameters Vladimir Sitnikov
• 23:08   Re: Memory leak with CALL to Procedure with COMMIT. Tom Lane
• 23:12   Re: [HACKERS] WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors Marina Polyakova
• 23:14   Re: Stored procedures and out parameters Andres Freund
• 23:26   Re: Memory leak with CALL to Procedure with COMMIT. Tom Lane
• 23:53   Re: Repeatable Read Isolation in SQL running via background worker Jeremy Finzel
• 23:53   Re: A slightly misleading comment in GetNewObjectId() Shawn Debnath
• 23:54   Re: Stored procedures and out parameters Shay Rojansky