Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c
Date
Msg-id ef986aa7-c7ca-ec34-19d9-fef38716b109@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c
List pgsql-hackers
On 16/08/2018 01:06, Andres Freund wrote:
> So it looks like msvc 2013 might be the relevant requirement.

According to my research (completely untested in practice), you need
2010 for mixed code and declarations and 2013 for named initialization
of structs.

I wonder what raising the msvc requirement would imply for supporting
older Windows versions.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c