Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materializedviews - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materializedviews
Date
Msg-id 20180816010355.GH3681@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materialized views  (Dian Fay <dian.m.fay@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materializedviews
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 07:46:49PM -0400, Dian Fay wrote:
> hi all! I discovered today that the REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW documentation
> doesn't mention that only the owner (or a superuser) may actually perform
> the refresh operation. This patch adds a note to that effect.

I think that's a good idea.  I would rewrite that a bit differently, like:
To refresh a materialized view, one must be the materalized view's owner
or a superuser.

Thougts or objections?
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve behavior of concurrent TRUNCATE
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: xact_start meaning when dealing with procedures?