Re: A slightly misleading comment in GetNewObjectId() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Shawn Debnath
Subject Re: A slightly misleading comment in GetNewObjectId()
Date
Msg-id 20180816175338.GA27190@60f81dc409fc.ant.amazon.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A slightly misleading comment in GetNewObjectId()  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:36:58AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 12:47 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> >> That makes it sound like a mere optimisation, but since commit
> >> 8e18d04d4da user-created objects are not allowed to have OIDs below
> >> that threshold.  So I propose the attached tweak.
> >
> > +1
> 
> Looks good to me, too.

+1 and thanks for pointing to the commit which makes this a reality.


-- 
Shawn Debnath


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeremy Finzel
Date:
Subject: Re: Repeatable Read Isolation in SQL running via background worker
Next
From: Shay Rojansky
Date:
Subject: Re: Stored procedures and out parameters