Hi Thomas,
On 08/16/2018 02:22 AM, Thomas Munro wrote:
> The idea of starting with DISTINCT was just that it's
> comparatively easy. We should certainly try to look ahead and bear
> those features in mind when figuring out the interfaces though. Would
> the indexam skip(scan, direction, prefix_size) operation I proposed be
> sufficient? Is there a better way?
>
Yeah, I'm hoping that a Committer can provide some feedback on the
direction that this patch needs to take.
One thing to consider is the pluggable storage patch, which is a lot
more important than this patch. I don't want this patch to get in the
way of that work, so it may have to wait a bit in order to see any new
potential requirements.
> I'm glad to see this topic come back!
>
You did the work, and yes hopefully we can get closer to this subject in
12 :)
Best regards,
Jesper
