Re: Index Skip Scan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Index Skip Scan
Date
Msg-id 53BB39FD-96F9-4858-9B6B-EF81CBB18221@anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Index Skip Scan  (Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On August 16, 2018 8:28:45 PM GMT+02:00, Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com> wrote:
>One thing to consider is the pluggable storage patch, which is a lot
>more important than this patch. I don't want this patch to get in the
>way of that work, so it may have to wait a bit in order to see any new
>potential requirements.

I don't think this would be a meaningful, relative to the size of the patch sets, amount of conflict between the two. So I don't think we have to consider relative importance (which I don't think is that easy to assess in this case).

Fwiw, I've a significantly further revised version of the tableam patch that I plan to send in a few days. Ported the current zheap patch as a separate AM which helped weed out a lot of issues.

Andres

Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: patch to allow disable of WAL recycling
Next
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materializedviews