Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

4 July 2017

• 00:31   [HACKERS] Revisiting NAMEDATALEN Emrul
• 00:36   Re: [HACKERS] Revisiting NAMEDATALEN Joshua D. Drake
• 00:46   Re: [HACKERS] Revisiting NAMEDATALEN Emrul
• 00:50   Re: [HACKERS] Error while copying a large file in pg_rewind Peter Eisentraut
• 01:27   Re: [HACKERS] Error while copying a large file in pg_rewind Tom Lane
• 01:39   Re: [HACKERS] Revisiting NAMEDATALEN Tom Lane
• 02:34   Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays Alvaro Herrera
• 04:30   Re: [HACKERS] WIP patch for avoiding duplicate initdb runs during"make check" Michael Paquier
• 04:42   Re: [HACKERS] Error while copying a large file in pg_rewind Michael Paquier
• 07:06   Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays Mark Rofail
• 09:21   Re: [HACKERS] Get stuck when dropping a subscription duringsynchronizing table Peter Eisentraut
• 09:26   Re: [HACKERS] subscription worker signalling wal writer too much Jeff Janes
• 09:39   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14699: Statement trigger and logicalreplication Peter Eisentraut
• 09:49   Re: [HACKERS] Get stuck when dropping a subscription duringsynchronizing table Masahiko Sawada
• 09:53   [HACKERS] WIP patch: distinguish selectivity of < from <= and > from >= Tom Lane
• 10:08   Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous execution Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 10:21   Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote
• 10:32   Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables Ashutosh Bapat
• 10:33   Re: [HACKERS] Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers Amit Kapila
• 10:34   Re: [HACKERS] Race conditions with WAL sender PID lookups Noah Misch
• 10:42   Re: [HACKERS] More race conditions in logical replication Noah Misch
• 11:25   Re: [HACKERS] Request more documentation for incompatibility ofparallelism and plpgsql exec_run_select Amit Kapila
• 12:20   Re: [HACKERS] Error while copying a large file in pg_rewind Kuntal Ghosh
• 12:25   Re: [HACKERS] Error while copying a large file in pg_rewind Kuntal Ghosh
• 13:14   Re: [HACKERS] Error while copying a large file in pg_rewind Michael Paquier
• 13:41   Re: [HACKERS] Error while copying a large file in pg_rewind Kuntal Ghosh
• 13:49   Re: [HACKERS] Multi column range partition table Dean Rasheed
• 13:53   Re: [HACKERS] hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected Michael Paquier
• 14:25   Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key Etsuro Fujita
• 14:55   [HACKERS] Update comment in ExecPartitionCheck Etsuro Fujita
• 15:08   Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key Amit Langote
• 15:15   Re: [HACKERS] Update comment in ExecPartitionCheck Amit Langote
• 15:18   Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key Amit Khandekar
• 15:19   Re: [HACKERS] hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected Amit Kapila
• 15:37   Re: [HACKERS] WIP patch: distinguish selectivity of < from <= and >from >= Ashutosh Bapat
• 15:53   Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key Amit Khandekar
• 16:51   Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range Rahila Syed
• 16:57   [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing AP
• 20:59   Re: [HACKERS] WIP patch: distinguish selectivity of < from <= and > from >= Tom Lane
• 21:32   Re: [HACKERS] WIP patch: distinguish selectivity of < from <= and >from >= Kuntal Ghosh
• 21:50   Re: [HACKERS] WIP patch: distinguish selectivity of < from <= and > from >= Tom Lane
• 23:24   Re: [HACKERS] WIP patch: distinguish selectivity of < from <= and > from >= Tom Lane
• 23:26   Re: [HACKERS] WIP patch: distinguish selectivity of < from <= and >from >= Kuntal Ghosh