Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

17 July 2017

• 02:27   Re: [HACKERS] Something for the TODO list: deprecating abstime and friends Greg Stark
• 03:05   Re: [HACKERS] More flexible LDAP auth search filters? Stephen Frost
• 03:08   Re: [HACKERS] More flexible LDAP auth search filters? Magnus Hagander
• 04:26   Re: [HACKERS] More flexible LDAP auth search filters? Thomas Munro
• 05:00   Re: [HACKERS] More flexible LDAP auth search filters? Mark Cave-Ayland
• 05:09   Re: [HACKERS] More flexible LDAP auth search filters? Thomas Munro
• 05:14   Re: [HACKERS] More flexible LDAP auth search filters? Stephen Frost
• 05:23   Re: [HACKERS] More flexible LDAP auth search filters? Stephen Frost
• 07:07   Re: [HACKERS] segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call Noah Misch
• 11:31   [HACKERS] PO # 0341 Neha Sharma
• 11:38   Re: [HACKERS] More flexible LDAP auth search filters? Mark Cave-Ayland
• 13:26   Re: [HACKERS] segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call Andres Freund
• 16:22   Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage Alexander Korotkov
• 16:34   Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench Alik Khilazhev
• 16:46   [HACKERS] pg_restore failed for foreign key constraint Neha Sharma
• 16:49   Re: [HACKERS] 10beta1/m68k: static assertion failed: "MAXALIGN toosmall to fit int32" Christoph Berg
• 16:51   Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench Fabien COELHO
• 17:18   Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench Alik Khilazhev
• 17:42   Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench Fabien COELHO
• 18:09   Re: [HACKERS] More flexible LDAP auth search filters? Magnus Hagander
• 18:11   Re: [HACKERS] More flexible LDAP auth search filters? Magnus Hagander
• 18:53   Re: [HACKERS] parallelize queries containing initplans Amit Kapila
• 19:38   Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6) Shubham Barai
• 20:03   Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore failed for foreign key constraint Tom Lane
• 20:48   [HACKERS] Unportable use of select for timeouts in PostgresNode.pm Andrew Dunstan
• 20:57   Re: [HACKERS] segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call Andres Freund
• 21:00   Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility Michael Paquier
• 21:16   Re: [HACKERS] Unportable use of select for timeouts in PostgresNode.pm Michael Paquier
• 21:27   Re: [HACKERS] Something for the TODO list: deprecating abstime and friends Robert Haas
• 21:29   Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility Michael Paquier
• 21:34   Re: [HACKERS] Multi column range partition table Robert Haas
• 21:37   Re: [HACKERS] Something for the TODO list: deprecating abstime and friends Michael Paquier
• 21:40   Re: [HACKERS] Unportable use of select for timeouts in PostgresNode.pm Tom Lane
• 21:46   [HACKERS] Why have we got both largeobject and large_object test files? Tom Lane
• 22:02   Re: [HACKERS] hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected Robert Haas
• 22:21   Re: [HACKERS] Something for the TODO list: deprecating abstime and friends Robert Haas
• 22:37   Re: [HACKERS] Multi column range partition table Dean Rasheed
• 22:47   Re: [HACKERS] More flexible LDAP auth search filters? Mark Cave-Ayland
• 22:51   Re: [HACKERS] hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected Michael Paquier
• 22:51   Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage Peter Geoghegan
• 22:59   Re: [HACKERS] Why have we got both largeobject and large_object test files? Stephen Frost
• 23:08   Re: [HACKERS] More flexible LDAP auth search filters? Magnus Hagander
• 23:53   Re: [HACKERS] Why have we got both largeobject and large_object test files? Tom Lane