Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Shubham Barai
Subject Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)
Date
Msg-id CALxAEPveBjtbTVaD-2vywUwEo2iJ-4oyqPFfyR+SFjMGEpqr9g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)  (Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

I am attaching a patch for predicate locking in gin index.


Regards,
Shubham



Sent with Mailtrack

On 11 July 2017 at 19:10, Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss@gmail.com> wrote:
Project: Explicitly support predicate locks in index AMs besides b-tree


I have done following tasks during this week.

1) worked on how to detect rw conflicts when fast update is enabled

2) created tests for different gin operators

3) went through some patches on commitfest to review

4) solved some issues that came up while testing


Sent with Mailtrack

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] parallelize queries containing initplans
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore failed for foreign key constraint