On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Conclusion:
>> As seen from the test results mentioned above, there is some performance
>> improvement with 3 SP(s), with 5 SP(s) the results with patch is slightly
>> better than HEAD, with 7 and 10 SP(s) we do see regression with patch.
>> Therefore, I think the threshold value of 4 for number of subtransactions
>> considered in the patch looks fine to me.
>>
>
> Thanks for the tests. Attached find the rebased patch on HEAD. I have ran
> latest pgindent on patch. I have yet to add wait event for group lock waits
> in this patch as is done by Robert in commit
> d4116a771925379c33cf4c6634ca620ed08b551d for ProcArrayGroupUpdate.
>
I have updated the patch to support wait events and moved it to upcoming CF.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
