Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

10 July 2017

• 00:23   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Minor typo in the source repository documentation Pantelis Theodosiou
• 01:31   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Minor typo in the source repository documentation Tom Lane
• 02:21   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Minor typo in the source repository documentation Martin Mai
• 05:02   Re: [HACKERS] COPY vs. transition tables Thomas Munro
• 06:29   Re: [HACKERS] Authentification method on client side checking Álvaro Hernández Tortosa
• 07:14   Re: [HACKERS] Fix header comment of streamutil.c Masahiko Sawada
• 07:17   Re: [HACKERS] Authentification method on client side checking Michael Paquier
• 07:23   Re: [HACKERS] replication_slot_catalog_xmin not explicitlyinitialized when creating procArray Masahiko Sawada
• 08:08   Re: [HACKERS] pg_receivewal and messages printed in non-verbose mode Michael Paquier
• 08:56   Re: [HACKERS] pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standby server Michael Paquier
• 09:34   Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM auth and Pgpool-II Michael Paquier
• 09:41   Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM auth and Pgpool-II Michael Paquier
• 10:11   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Minor typo in the source repository documentation Tom Lane
• 10:43   Re: [HACKERS] POC: Cache data in GetSnapshotData() Mithun Cy
• 11:09   Re: [HACKERS] hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave asexpected Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 11:15   Re: [HACKERS] Oddity in error handling of constraint violation inExecConstraints for partitioned tables Etsuro Fujita
• 11:56   Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback Amit Langote
• 12:31   Re: [HACKERS] Oddity in error handling of constraint violation inExecConstraints for partitioned tables Amit Langote
• 12:32   Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback Craig Ringer
• 12:36   [HACKERS] Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is*still* broken) Noah Misch
• 12:49   Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench Alik Khilazhev
• 13:04   [HACKERS] Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is*still* broken) Michael Paquier
• 13:15   Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback Amit Langote
• 13:54   Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench Amit Kapila
• 15:28   Re: [HACKERS] hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected Amit Kapila
• 15:29   Re: [HACKERS] paths in partitions of a dummy partitioned table Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 15:30   Re: [HACKERS] List of hostaddrs not supported Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:39   Re: [HACKERS] POC: Sharing record typmods between backends Thomas Munro
• 15:57   Re: [HACKERS] hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave asexpected Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 16:10   Re: [HACKERS] COPY vs. transition tables Andrew Gierth
• 16:27   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow multiple hostaddrs to go with multiple hostnames. Masahiko Sawada
• 16:27   Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables Ashutosh Bapat
• 16:45   Re: [HACKERS] COPY vs. transition tables Andrew Gierth
• 16:47   Re: [HACKERS] List of hostaddrs not supported Arthur Zakirov
• 16:54   Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench Fabien COELHO
• 17:35   Re: [HACKERS] paths in partitions of a dummy partitioned table Ashutosh Bapat
• 18:08   [HACKERS] Double shared memory allocation for SLRU LWLocks Alexander Korotkov
• 18:32   Re: [HACKERS] List of hostaddrs not supported Heikki Linnakangas
• 18:38   Re: [HACKERS] Dumping database creation options and ACLs Adrien Nayrat
• 19:01   [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow multiple hostaddrs to go with multiplehostnames. Heikki Linnakangas
• 19:07   Re: [HACKERS] hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected Amit Kapila
• 19:21   Re: [HACKERS] WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors Marina Polyakova
• 20:08   Re: [HACKERS] retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken) Tom Lane
• 20:19   [HACKERS] Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is*still* broken) Magnus Hagander
• 20:46   Re: [HACKERS] retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken) Tom Lane
• 20:47   [HACKERS] Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is*still* broken) Noah Misch
• 20:48   [HACKERS] Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is*still* broken) Noah Misch
• 22:03   Re: [HACKERS] retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken) Tom Lane
• 23:34   Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback David Fetter