Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

11 July 2017

• 00:40   [HACKERS] RFC: Key normalization for nbtree Peter Geoghegan
• 01:53   Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Key normalization for nbtree Claudio Freire
• 02:23   Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Key normalization for nbtree Alvaro Herrera
• 02:36   Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Key normalization for nbtree Peter Geoghegan
• 02:43   Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Key normalization for nbtree Peter Geoghegan
• 03:44   [HACKERS] Re: Oddity in error handling of constraint violation inExecConstraints for partitioned tables Robert Haas
• 03:56   Re: [HACKERS] Add support for tuple routing to foreign partitions Robert Haas
• 04:33   Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback Robert Haas
• 04:46   Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback David Fetter
• 05:04   Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem Claudio Freire
• 05:08   Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Key normalization for nbtree Greg Stark
• 05:17   Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback Greg Stark
• 05:30   Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Key normalization for nbtree Peter Geoghegan
• 05:50   Re: [HACKERS] More race conditions in logical replication Alvaro Herrera
• 06:21   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow multiple hostaddrs to go with multiple hostnames. Masahiko Sawada
• 06:28   Re: [HACKERS] pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standby server Masahiko Sawada
• 06:59   Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback Amit Langote
• 07:21   Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing AP
• 07:32   Re: [HACKERS] hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave asexpected Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 07:34   Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback Paul A Jungwirth
• 07:44   Re: [HACKERS] strcmp() tie-breaker for identical ICU-collated strings Peter Geoghegan
• 07:47   Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback Amit Langote
• 08:12   Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing Amit Kapila
• 08:40   Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing Alvaro Herrera
• 09:32   [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions Jeff Janes
• 10:34   Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback Alvaro Herrera
• 10:51   Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions Dilip Kumar
• 12:32   Re: [HACKERS] Multi column range partition table Noah Misch
• 13:34   [HACKERS] Typo in backend/storage/ipc/standby.c Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 14:28   Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous execution Antonin Houska
• 15:57   Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback Ashutosh Bapat
• 16:49   Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Ashutosh Bapat
• 18:13   Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing Amit Kapila
• 18:29   Re: [HACKERS] Multi column range partition table Ashutosh Bapat
• 19:40   [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6) Shubham Barai
• 22:44   [HACKERS] Arrays of domains Tom Lane
• 22:51   Fwd: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem Claudio Freire
• 23:38   Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing Alvaro Herrera
• 23:45   Re: [HACKERS] Arrays of domains David Fetter
• 23:58   Re: [HACKERS] Arrays of domains Andrew Dunstan