Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing
Date
Msg-id 20170711173807.fdw3o7om22rgvp2f@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pgsql 10: hash indexes testing
List pgsql-hackers
Amit Kapila wrote:

> Yes, I also think the same idea can be used, in fact, I have mentioned
> it [1] as soon as you have committed that patch.  Do we want to do
> anything at this stage for PG-10?  I don't think we should attempt
> something this late unless people feel this is a show-stopper issue
> for usage of hash indexes.  If required, I think a separate function
> can be provided to allow users to perform squeeze operation.

Sorry, I have no idea how critical this squeeze thing is for the
newfangled hash indexes, so I cannot comment on that.  Does this make
the indexes unusable in some way under some circumstances?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Fwd: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Arrays of domains