Home > mailing lists

Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

8 June 2017

00:10 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GSOC 17] Eliminate O(N^2) scaling fromrw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions Kevin Grittner
00:11 Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitioned table Mike Palmiotto
00:29 Re: [HACKERS] Directory pg_replslot is not properly cleaned Fabrízio de Royes Mello
00:30 Re: [HACKERS] Directory pg_replslot is not properly cleaned Andres Freund
00:31 Re: [HACKERS] Race conditions with WAL sender PID lookups Robert Haas
00:46 Re: [HACKERS] Directory pg_replslot is not properly cleaned Fabrízio de Royes Mello
00:57 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 changes in exclusion constraints - did something change? CASE WHEN behavior oddity Tom Lane
01:00 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 changes in exclusion constraints - didsomething change? CASE WHEN behavior oddity David G. Johnston
01:34 Re: [HACKERS] GSOC'17 project introduction: Parallel COPY executionwith errors handling Alex K
01:50 Re: [HACKERS] statement_timeout is not working as expected with postgres_fdw Robert Haas
02:03 Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key Robert Haas
02:36 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Alter subscription..SET - NOTICE message is comingfor table which is already removed Peter Eisentraut
02:49 [HACKERS] logical replication - possible remaining problem Erik Rijkers
03:00 Re: [HACKERS] Race conditions with WAL sender PID lookups Erik Rijkers
03:06 Re: [HACKERS] HACKERS[PROPOSAL] split ProcArrayLock into multiple parts Jim Van Fleet
03:07 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 changes in exclusion constraints - did something change? CASE WHEN behavior oddity Regina Obe
03:18 Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - possible remaining problem Alvaro Herrera
03:19 Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table Kevin Grittner
03:47 Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table Kevin Grittner
03:48 Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table Thomas Munro
04:00 Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table Peter Geoghegan
04:07 Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - possible remaining problem Erik Rijkers
04:13 Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table Kevin Grittner
04:21 Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table Kevin Grittner
04:25 Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table Peter Geoghegan
04:38 Re: [HACKERS] HACKERS[PROPOSAL] split ProcArrayLock into multipleparts Sokolov Yura
05:05 Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table Thomas Munro
05:50 Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table Thomas Munro
06:04 Re: [HACKERS] BEFORE trigger can cause undetected partitionconstraint violation Amit Langote
06:23 Re: [HACKERS] Is ECPG's SET CONNECTION really not thread-aware? Tsunakawa, Takayuki
06:24 Re: [HACKERS] Notes on testing Postgres 10b1 Peter Eisentraut
06:50 Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - possible remaining problem Petr Jelinek
07:08 Re: [HACKERS] Use of snapshot in logical replication Craig Ringer
07:09 Re: [HACKERS] tap tests on older branches fail if concurrency is used Craig Ringer
07:10 Re: [HACKERS] Notes on testing Postgres 10b1 Petr Jelinek
07:14 Re: [HACKERS] Use of snapshot in logical replication Petr Jelinek
07:18 Re: [HACKERS] Use of snapshot in logical replication Andres Freund
07:19 Re: [HACKERS] Notes on testing Postgres 10b1 Josh Berkus
07:25 Re: [HACKERS] Notes on testing Postgres 10b1 Petr Jelinek
07:37 Re: [HACKERS] Notes on testing Postgres 10b1 Peter Eisentraut
07:42 Re: [HACKERS] TAP: allow overriding PostgresNode in get_new_node Chapman Flack
07:50 Re: [HACKERS] Notes on testing Postgres 10b1 Josh Berkus
08:01 Re: [HACKERS] Notes on testing Postgres 10b1 Petr Jelinek
08:01 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 changes in exclusion constraints - did something change? CASE WHEN behavior oddity Tom Lane
08:58 Re: [HACKERS] Fix a typo in snapmgr.c Masahiko Sawada
09:28 [HACKERS] Does pg_upgrade really support "make installcheck"? Tom Lane
10:15 Re: [HACKERS] Race conditions with WAL sender PID lookups Michael Paquier
11:07 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GSOC 17] Eliminate O(N^2) scaling fromrw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions Mengxing Liu
11:54 Re: [HACKERS] walsender & parallelism Noah Misch
11:57 Re: [HACKERS] walsender termination error messages worse in v10 Noah Misch
11:58 [HACKERS] src/include/Makefile is missing statistics directory Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
13:04 Re: [HACKERS] Does pg_upgrade really support "make installcheck"? Neha Khatri
13:54 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Alter subscription..SET - NOTICE message is comingfor table which is already removed Masahiko Sawada
14:00 [HACKERS] Long binded parameter value in the postgres log Nikitin Nikolay
14:36 [HACKERS] List of hostaddrs not supported Heikki Linnakangas
15:24 Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning Ashutosh Bapat
15:43 Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote
16:25 Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Ashutosh Bapat
16:34 Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning Ashutosh Bapat
16:59 Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning Jeevan Ladhe
17:01 Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key Amit Kapila
18:25 Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Crash observed during the start of the Postgres process K S, Sandhya (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)
18:36 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Aggregation support for aggregate functionsthat use transitions not implemented for array_agg Ashutosh Bapat
18:58 Re: [HACKERS] Broken hint bits (freeze) Amit Kapila
19:19 Re: [HACKERS] Broken hint bits (freeze) Dmitriy Sarafannikov
19:49 Re: [HACKERS] List of hostaddrs not supported Tom Lane
20:03 Re: [HACKERS] Broken hint bits (freeze) Amit Kapila
20:44 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Improve bitmap costing for lossy pages Dilip Kumar
20:46 Re: [HACKERS] List of hostaddrs not supported Robert Haas
20:49 Re: [HACKERS] Does pg_upgrade really support "make installcheck"? Andrew Dunstan
20:50 Re: [HACKERS] List of hostaddrs not supported Tom Lane
21:02 Re: [HACKERS] Does pg_upgrade really support "make installcheck"? Tom Lane
21:18 Re: [HACKERS] List of hostaddrs not supported Robert Haas
21:19 Re: [HACKERS] strange error message from slave when connection tomaster cannot be established Robert Haas
21:39 Re: [HACKERS] List of hostaddrs not supported David G. Johnston
21:57 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 changes in exclusion constraints - did something change? CASE WHEN behavior oddity Regina Obe
22:31 Re: [HACKERS] Long binded parameter value in the postgres log Masahiko Sawada
22:49 Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning Robert Haas
22:56 Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning Robert Haas
23:07 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 changes in exclusion constraints - didsomething change? CASE WHEN behavior oddity 'Andres Freund'
23:10 Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key Robert Haas
23:11 Re: [HACKERS] Notes on testing Postgres 10b1 Josh Berkus
23:15 Re: [HACKERS] Notes on testing Postgres 10b1 Josh Berkus
23:17 Re: [HACKERS] strange error message from slave when connection tomaster cannot be established Pavel Stehule
23:36 Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table Robert Haas
23:48 Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table Heikki Linnakangas
23:50 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 changes in exclusion constraints - did something change? CASE WHEN behavior oddity Tom Lane
23:56 Re: [HACKERS] pgbench tap tests & minor fixes Fabien COELHO
23:59 Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table Robert Haas