Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table
Date
Msg-id 80ad7b4e-225b-903d-9ab6-9dd1d697ffbb@iki.fi
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 06/08/2017 08:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I freely admit I encouraged you to commit this.  I did not imagine
> that would be followed immediately by abdicating all responsibility
> for it.  My mistake, I guess.

Robert, chill out. Kevin offered to revert. It's perhaps not the best 
way forward - I'm not familiar with the details here - but it's 
certainly one way to take responsibility.

- Heikki




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 changes in exclusion constraints - did something change? CASE WHEN behavior oddity