Re: [HACKERS] Is ECPG's SET CONNECTION really not thread-aware? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tsunakawa, Takayuki
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Is ECPG's SET CONNECTION really not thread-aware?
Date
Msg-id 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F721097@G01JPEXMBYT05
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Is ECPG's SET CONNECTION really not thread-aware?  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dear Meskes,

From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michael Meskes
> Done.

Thanks, I confirmed the commit messages.


> My standard workflow is to wait a couple days to see if everything works
> nicely before backporting. Obviously this doesn't make any sense for a doc
> patch, sigh.

I see.  That's a good idea.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BEFORE trigger can cause undetected partitionconstraint violation
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Notes on testing Postgres 10b1