Re: [HACKERS] Does pg_upgrade really support "make installcheck"? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Does pg_upgrade really support "make installcheck"?
Date
Msg-id 13769.1496934136@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Does pg_upgrade really support "make installcheck"?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> The whole thing is explained here:
> <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20327.1322435869@sss.pgh.pa.us>

> And since then the buildfarm has acquired a separate optional module
> that tests pg_upgrade. It's enabled by default in the sample config file.

> So it's not like we don't have buildfarm coverage - we do in fact.
> Re-enabling this in the Makefile would a) result in breakage on some
> members and b) make most members do redundant work.

> I vote for improving the docs.

WFM, I'll go do that (and maybe improve the comment in the makefile)
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] List of hostaddrs not supported
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] List of hostaddrs not supported