Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - possible remaining problem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Erik Rijkers
Subject Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - possible remaining problem
Date
Msg-id 1422bcecdf3451027351cf12dfa0688c@xs4all.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - possible remaining problem  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017-06-07 23:18, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Erik Rijkers wrote:
> 
>> Now, looking at the script again I am thinking that it would be 
>> reasonable
>> to expect that after issuing
>>    delete from pg_subscription;
>> 
>> the other 2 tables are /also/ cleaned, automatically, as a 
>> consequence.  (Is
>> this reasonable? this is really the main question of this email).
> 
> I don't think it's reasonable to expect that the system recovers
> automatically from what amounts to catalog corruption.  You should be
> using the DDL that removes subscriptions instead.

You're right, that makes sense.
Thanks.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table