Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

2 June 2017

• 00:11   Re: [HACKERS] Effect of changing the value forPARALLEL_TUPLE_QUEUE_SIZE Andres Freund
• 00:25   Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions Andres Freund
• 00:28   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication busy-waiting on a lock Andres Freund
• 00:58   [HACKERS] strcmp() tie-breaker for identical ICU-collated strings Amit Khandekar
• 01:35   Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning Jeevan Ladhe
• 01:47   Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key Robert Haas
• 01:51   [HACKERS] BEFORE trigger can cause undetected partition constraint violation Robert Haas
• 01:56   Re: [HACKERS] COPY (query) TO ... doesn't allow parallelism Robert Haas
• 02:02   Re: [HACKERS] COPY (query) TO ... doesn't allow parallelism Andres Freund
• 03:21   Re: [HACKERS] BEFORE trigger can cause undetected partitionconstraint violation Jeevan Ladhe
• 03:23   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression Andres Freund
• 03:24   Re: [HACKERS] strcmp() tie-breaker for identical ICU-collated strings Thomas Munro
• 03:27   Re: [HACKERS] strcmp() tie-breaker for identical ICU-collated strings Peter Geoghegan
• 03:41   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] quiet conversion warning in DatumGetFloat4 Tom Lane
• 03:45   Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions Joe Conway
• 03:48   Re: [HACKERS] strcmp() tie-breaker for identical ICU-collated strings Tom Lane
• 03:48   Re: [HACKERS] strcmp() tie-breaker for identical ICU-collated strings Thomas Munro
• 04:05   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication and PANIC during shutdowncheckpoint in publisher Andres Freund
• 04:05   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] quiet conversion warning in DatumGetFloat4 Chapman Flack
• 04:05   Re: [HACKERS] BEFORE trigger can cause undetected partition constraint violation Tom Lane
• 04:20   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] quiet conversion warning in DatumGetFloat4 Tom Lane
• 04:46   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths Mark Kirkwood
• 05:38   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication and PANIC during shutdowncheckpoint in publisher Michael Paquier
• 05:47   Re: [HACKERS] Perfomance bug in v10 David Rowley
• 06:29   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication and PANIC during shutdowncheckpoint in publisher Andres Freund
• 07:05   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication and PANIC during shutdowncheckpoint in publisher Michael Paquier
• 07:08   Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 Stephen Frost
• 07:08   Re: [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 Stephen Frost
• 07:13   Re: [HACKERS] Perfomance bug in v10 Tom Lane
• 07:13   Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 Michael Paquier
• 07:13   Re: [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 Michael Paquier
• 07:14   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication and PANIC during shutdowncheckpoint in publisher Andres Freund
• 07:20   Re: [HACKERS] "create publication..all tables" ignore 'partition notsupported' error Peter Eisentraut
• 07:25   Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 Robert Haas
• 07:25   Re: [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 Robert Haas
• 07:33   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication and PANIC during shutdowncheckpoint in publisher Robert Haas
• 07:36   Re: [HACKERS] BEFORE trigger can cause undetected partitionconstraint violation Robert Haas
• 07:38   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication busy-waiting on a lock Robert Haas
• 07:42   Re: [HACKERS] Error while creating subscription when server isrunning in single user mode Peter Eisentraut
• 07:43   Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Add --no-comments to skip COMMENTs with pg_dump Robert Haas
• 07:55   Re: [HACKERS] Error while creating subscription when server isrunning in single user mode Andres Freund
• 08:05   Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Add --no-comments to skip COMMENTs with pg_dump Tom Lane
• 08:17   Re: [HACKERS] walsender & parallelism Peter Eisentraut
• 08:23   Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Add --no-comments to skip COMMENTs with pg_dump Stephen Frost
• 09:03   Re: [HACKERS] walsender & parallelism Andres Freund
• 10:51   Re: [HACKERS] BEFORE trigger can cause undetected partitionconstraint violation Amit Langote
• 11:11   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths Erik Rijkers
• 11:21   Re: [HACKERS] Race conditions with WAL sender PID lookups Noah Misch
• 11:24   Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions Jeff Davis
• 11:30   Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions Jeff Davis
• 11:32   [HACKERS] Fix a typo in predicate.c Masahiko Sawada
• 11:41   Re: [HACKERS] Get stuck when dropping a subscription duringsynchronizing table Noah Misch
• 11:58   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Fixed malformed error message on malformed SCRAM message. Noah Misch
• 12:11   Re: [HACKERS] Race conditions with WAL sender PID lookups Michael Paquier
• 12:22   Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, soculicidae is *still* broken) Noah Misch
• 12:31   Re: [HACKERS] Why does logical replication launcher set application_name? Masahiko Sawada
• 12:55   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths Mark Kirkwood
• 13:41   Re: [HACKERS] Fix a typo in predicate.c Magnus Hagander
• 13:48   Re: [HACKERS] statement_timeout is not working as expected with postgres_fdw Rafia Sabih
• 13:51   [HACKERS] proposal: PLpgSQL parallel assignemnt Pavel Stehule
• 14:06   Re: [HACKERS] proposal: PLpgSQL parallel assignemnt Craig Ringer
• 14:15   Re: [HACKERS] proposal: PLpgSQL parallel assignemnt Pavel Stehule
• 14:16   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GSOC 17] Eliminate O(N^2) scaling fromrw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions Mengxing Liu
• 14:40   [HACKERS] Do we need the gcc feature "__builtin_expect" to promote the branches prediction? Hao Lee
• 15:10   Re: [HACKERS] Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues forforeign tables Etsuro Fujita
• 15:14   [HACKERS] comment fix in attoptcache.c Amit Langote
• 15:18   Re: [HACKERS] comment fix in attoptcache.c Magnus Hagander
• 15:51   [HACKERS] Why restore_command is called for existing files in pg_xlog? Alexander Kukushkin
• 16:42   Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range Rafia Sabih
• 16:48   [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table Marko Tiikkaja
• 16:50   Re: [HACKERS] Do we need the gcc feature "__builtin_expect" topromote the branches prediction? Craig Ringer
• 16:50   Re: [HACKERS] Broken hint bits (freeze) Dmitriy Sarafannikov
• 17:07   Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key Amit Khandekar
• 17:27   Re: [HACKERS] Do we need the gcc feature "__builtin_expect" topromote the branches prediction? Julien Rouhaud
• 18:09   Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range Amit Kapila
• 18:10   Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table Thomas Munro
• 18:15   Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Add --no-comments to skip COMMENTs with pg_dump Robert Haas
• 18:18   Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range Robert Haas
• 18:20   Re: [HACKERS] make check false success Robert Haas
• 18:24   Re: [HACKERS] Perfomance bug in v10 Teodor Sigaev
• 18:28   Re: [HACKERS] Do we need the gcc feature "__builtin_expect" topromote the branches prediction? Hao Lee
• 18:47   Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions Robert Haas
• 19:01   Re: [HACKERS] Effect of changing the value for PARALLEL_TUPLE_QUEUE_SIZE Amit Kapila
• 19:08   Re: [HACKERS] Effect of changing the value for PARALLEL_TUPLE_QUEUE_SIZE Robert Haas
• 19:15   Re: [HACKERS] Effect of changing the value for PARALLEL_TUPLE_QUEUE_SIZE Amit Kapila
• 19:20   Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table Thomas Munro
• 19:27   Re: [HACKERS] Perfomance bug in v10 Tom Lane
• 19:37   Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidaeis *still* broken) Amit Kapila
• 19:50   Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidaeis *still* broken) Petr Jelinek
• 20:19   Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions Joe Conway
• 20:20   Re: [HACKERS] Perfomance bug in v10 Claudio Freire
• 20:42   Re: [HACKERS] Range Merge Join v1 Jeff Davis
• 20:46   Re: [HACKERS] Perfomance bug in v10 Teodor Sigaev
• 20:50   Re: [HACKERS] Perfomance bug in v10 Claudio Freire
• 21:02   Re: [HACKERS] Perfomance bug in v10 Tom Lane
• 21:08   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GSOC 17] Eliminate O(N^2) scaling fromrw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions Alvaro Herrera
• 21:32   Re: [HACKERS] Do we need the gcc feature "__builtin_expect" topromote the branches prediction? Andres Freund
• 21:45   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] relocation truncated to fit: citus build failure on s390x Tom Lane
• 22:20   Re: [HACKERS] Use of non-restart-safe storage by temp_tablespaces Bruce Momjian
• 22:31   [HACKERS] sketchy partcollation handling Robert Haas
• 22:32   Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions Robert Haas
• 22:42   [HACKERS] Questions about upgrade standby with rsync Sergey Burladyan
• 22:48   Re: [HACKERS] pg_class.relpartbound definition overly brittle Robert Haas
• 22:50   Re: [HACKERS] TAP: allow overriding PostgresNode in get_new_node Robert Haas
• 22:56   Re: [HACKERS] BEFORE trigger can cause undetected partitionconstraint violation Robert Haas
• 22:58   Re: [HACKERS] Questions about upgrade standby with rsync Robert Haas
• 22:59   Re: [HACKERS] pg_class.relpartbound definition overly brittle Tom Lane
• 23:05   Re: [HACKERS] proposal: PLpgSQL parallel assignemnt Pavel Stehule
• 23:28   Re: [HACKERS] Perfomance bug in v10 Teodor Sigaev
• 23:34   Re: [HACKERS] strcmp() tie-breaker for identical ICU-collated strings Amit Khandekar
• 23:44   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GSOC 17] Eliminate O(N^2) scaling fromrw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions Kevin Grittner