Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression
Date
Msg-id 20170601212327.nknav4z3s4b43lqf@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
On 2017-06-01 19:08:33 +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 01/06/17 16:51, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> >> Here's a patch doing what I suggested above.  The second patch addresses
> >> an independent oversight where the post alter hook was invoked before
> >> doing the catalog update.
> > 
> > 0002 is a slam-dunk.  I don't object to 0001 but haven't reviewed it carefully.
> > 
> 
> I did go over the code (ie didn't do actual testing), and I like it much
> better than the current state. Both in terms of making the behavior more
> consistent and the fact that the code is simpler.
> 
> So +1 to go ahead with both patches.

Thanks for the look!  I unfortunately forgot to credit you as a
reviewer, sorry for that.

Pushed both.

- Andres



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Mike Palmiotto
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitioned table
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Re: BUG #14680: startup process on standby encounter adeadlock of TwoPhaseStateLock when redo 2PC xlog