Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Petr Jelinek
Subject Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths
Date
Msg-id 53081c5a-1156-a58a-b859-c01f4db0c8de@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths  (Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 02/06/17 08:55, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> On 02/06/17 17:11, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> 
>> On 2017-06-02 00:46, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>>> On 31/05/17 21:16, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm seeing a new failure with the patch applied - this time the
>>> history table has missing rows. Petr, I'll put back your access :-)
>>
>> Is this error during 1-minute runs?
>>
>> I'm asking because I've moved back to longer (1-hour) runs (no errors
>> so far), and I'd like to keep track of what the most 'vulnerable'
>> parameters are.
>>
> 
> Yeah, still using your test config (with my minor modifications).
> 
> When I got the error the 1st time, I did a complete make clean and
> rebuild....but it is still possible I've 'done it wrong' - so
> independent confirmation would be good!

Well, I've seen this issue as well while I was developing the fix, but
the patch I proposed fixed it for me as well as the original issue.

--  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TAP: allow overriding PostgresNode in get_new_node
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning