On 02/06/17 22:29, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 02/06/17 08:55, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>> On 02/06/17 17:11, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>>
>>> On 2017-06-02 00:46, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>>>> On 31/05/17 21:16, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm seeing a new failure with the patch applied - this time the
>>>> history table has missing rows. Petr, I'll put back your access :-)
>>>
>>> Is this error during 1-minute runs?
>>>
>>> I'm asking because I've moved back to longer (1-hour) runs (no errors
>>> so far), and I'd like to keep track of what the most 'vulnerable'
>>> parameters are.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, still using your test config (with my minor modifications).
>>
>> When I got the error the 1st time, I did a complete make clean and
>> rebuild....but it is still possible I've 'done it wrong' - so
>> independent confirmation would be good!
>
> Well, I've seen this issue as well while I was developing the fix, but
> the patch I proposed fixed it for me as well as the original issue.
>
While I was testing something for different thread I noticed that I
manage transactions incorrectly in this patch. Fixed here, I didn't test
it much yet (it takes a while as you know :) ). Not sure if it's related
to the issue you've seen though.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
