Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

6 May 2017

• 00:11   Re: [HACKERS] Not getting error if ALTER SUBSCRIPTION syntax is wrong. Robert Haas
• 00:20   Re: [HACKERS] idea: custom log_line_prefix components besides application_name Robert Haas
• 00:48   Re: [HACKERS] Row Level Security UPDATE Confusion Rod Taylor
• 01:29   Re: [HACKERS] modeling parallel contention (was: Parallel Append implementation) Robert Haas
• 01:34   Re: [HACKERS] modeling parallel contention (was: Parallel Append implementation) Robert Haas
• 01:40   Re: [HACKERS] modeling parallel contention (was: Parallel Append implementation) Robert Haas
• 02:11   Re: [HACKERS] Row Level Security UPDATE Confusion Stephen Frost
• 03:24   Re: [HACKERS] modeling parallel contention (was: Parallel Appendimplementation) Andres Freund
• 03:42   Re: [HACKERS] modeling parallel contention (was: Parallel Append implementation) Peter Geoghegan
• 04:07   Re: [HACKERS] [patch] Build pgoutput with MSVC MauMau
• 04:08   Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes Bruce Momjian
• 05:11   Re: [HACKERS] statement_timeout is not working as expected with postgres_fdw Amit Kapila
• 05:28   Re: [HACKERS] [patch] Build pgoutput with MSVC Michael Paquier
• 05:37   [HACKERS] Draft release notes for next week's back-branch releases Tom Lane
• 06:30   Re: [HACKERS] [patch] Build pgoutput with MSVC MauMau
• 07:44   Re: [HACKERS] modeling parallel contention (was: Parallel Append implementation) Thomas Munro
• 08:52   Re: [HACKERS] statement_timeout is not working as expected with postgres_fdw Amit Kapila
• 09:17   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table Noah Misch
• 09:28   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table Stephen Frost
• 09:38   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] New command to monitor progression of longrunning queries Vinayak Pokale
• 09:57   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] New command to monitor progression of longrunning queries Jaime Casanova
• 11:33   Re: [HACKERS] delta relations in AFTER triggers Noah Misch
• 11:34   Re: [HACKERS] delta relations in AFTER triggers Noah Misch
• 11:48   Re: [HACKERS] Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn() Noah Misch
• 12:09   Re: [HACKERS] Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn() Tom Lane
• 14:42   [HACKERS] "CURRENT_ROLE" is not documented Fabien COELHO
• 16:40   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication and PANIC during shutdowncheckpoint in publisher Michael Paquier
• 16:44   Re: [HACKERS] password_encryption, default and 'plain' support Vik Fearing
• 16:56   Re: [HACKERS] password_encryption, default and 'plain' support Gavin Flower
• 18:02   Re: [HACKERS] [PROPOSAL] Use SnapshotAny in get_actual_variable_range Amit Kapila
• 18:44   Re: [HACKERS] Not getting error if ALTER SUBSCRIPTION syntax iswrong. Petr Jelinek
• 18:56   Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes for next week's back-branchreleases Petr Jelinek
• 19:57   [HACKERS] Atomics for heap_parallelscan_nextpage() David Rowley
• 21:25   Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes for next week's back-branch releases Tom Lane
• 21:49   Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes for next week's back-branchreleases Petr Jelinek
• 22:16   Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes for next week's back-branch releases Tom Lane
• 22:55   Re: [HACKERS] statement_timeout is not working as expected with postgres_fdw Robert Haas
• 22:56   Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes for next week's back-branchreleases Petr Jelinek
• 23:01   Re: [HACKERS] "CURRENT_ROLE" is not documented Tom Lane
• 23:11   Re: [HACKERS] statement_timeout is not working as expected with postgres_fdw Robert Haas
• 23:15   Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes for next week's back-branch releases Tom Lane
• 23:29   Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes for next week's back-branchreleases Petr Jelinek
• 23:38   Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes for next week's back-branch releases Tom Lane
• 23:42   Re: [HACKERS] "CURRENT_ROLE" is not documented Fabien COELHO