Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes for next week's back-branchreleases - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Petr Jelinek
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes for next week's back-branchreleases
Date
Msg-id 5c1adfb7-ecde-1140-9a16-e1fccbc6a85d@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Draft release notes for next week's back-branch releases  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes for next week's back-branch releases  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 06/05/17 01:37, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've written $SUBJECT ... you can find them at
> 
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=54dbd4dc78b045ffcc046b9a43681770c3992dd4
> 

Hmm, the 2bef06d51 and 56e19d938 are fixes for different bugs, we can
keep them together since result of both is corrupted snapshot, but the
description can't just mangle pieces of text from different commits
together like this as that's misleading.

The 2bef06d51 is about not preserving global xmin correctly, window for
that is indeed small. But the 56e19d938 was about using ondisk snapshot
(which only contain transactions changing catalogs) as full snapshots,
it's more about creating multiple logical replication slots while
concurrent writes happen.

--  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Not getting error if ALTER SUBSCRIPTION syntax iswrong.
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Atomics for heap_parallelscan_nextpage()