Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes
Date
Msg-id 20170505220850.GA19104@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May  5, 2017 at 02:28:50PM +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 05/05/17 02:46, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I am getting tired of saying this.  When I am writing the release notes,
> > I am trying to figure out how it affects our shipped code, and the only
> > "decoding" I know of is test_decoding.  My message was this:
> 
> I actually think the main misunderstanding here comes from the
> test_decoding name interpretation. The test_decoding does not decode
> anything and there are no external "decoders". The decoding happens in
> core, the decoding just provides C API for plugins to consume the
> decoded info (ie, heap tuples and similar). The test_decoding *tests*
> the decoding API and the external projects use the decoding API as well
> but they don't really decode anything, their role is of filtering and
> deciding the wire protocol mostly.

Yes, I thought test_decoding did decoding and not just use a
backend-internal decoder.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "MauMau"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [patch] Build pgoutput with MSVC
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] statement_timeout is not working as expected with postgres_fdw