Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

2 January 2012

• 03:32   controlling the location of server-side SSL files Peter Eisentraut
• 03:38   Re: PL/pgSQL return value in after triggers Peter Eisentraut
• 03:44   Re: information schema/aclexplode doesn't know about default privileges Peter Eisentraut
• 03:50   sorting operators in pg_dump Peter Eisentraut
• 03:51   Re: PL/pgSQL return value in after triggers Pavel Stehule
• 04:04   Re: spinlocks on powerpc Tom Lane
• 05:42   Re: SEGFAULT on SELECT * FROM view chris r.
• 08:33   SQL:2011 features Simon Riggs
• 10:25   Re: sorting operators in pg_dump Dimitri Fontaine
• 10:31   Re: [RFC] grants vs. inherited tables Dimitri Fontaine
• 12:13   patch: ALTER TABLE IF EXISTS Pavel Stehule
• 12:47   Re: patch: ALTER TABLE IF EXISTS Simon Riggs
• 12:59   Re: patch: ALTER TABLE IF EXISTS Tomas Vondra
• 13:15   Re: patch: ALTER TABLE IF EXISTS Pavel Stehule
• 13:47   Re: controlling the location of server-side SSL files Magnus Hagander
• 13:51   Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches Magnus Hagander
• 15:19   Re: alternate psql file locations Andrew Dunstan
• 15:45   Re: spinlocks on powerpc Manabu Ori
• 16:02   Re: patch: ALTER TABLE IF EXISTS Pavel Stehule
• 16:09   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Simon Riggs
• 16:10   Re: spinlocks on powerpc Manabu Ori
• 16:17   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Tom Lane
• 16:18   Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches Andrew Dunstan
• 16:30   Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame Simon Riggs
• 16:42   Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame Tom Lane
• 16:50   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Simon Riggs
• 17:06   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Noah Misch
• 17:47   Re: SQL:2011 features Peter Eisentraut
• 17:48   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Simon Riggs
• 18:11   Re: SQL:2011 features Simon Riggs
• 18:13   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Tom Lane
• 18:15   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Tom Lane
• 18:25   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Noah Misch
• 18:35   Re: backup_label during crash recovery: do we know how to solve it? Magnus Hagander
• 18:35   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Alvaro Herrera
• 18:39   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Noah Misch
• 18:42   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Simon Riggs
• 18:47   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Simon Riggs
• 18:50   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Alvaro Herrera
• 18:54   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Simon Riggs
• 18:59   Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame Simon Riggs
• 19:06   Re: SQL:2011 features Pavel Stehule
• 19:20   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Tom Lane
• 20:07   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Simon Riggs
• 20:17   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Simon Riggs
• 20:37   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_regress: Replace exit_nicely() with exit() plus atexit() hook Peter Eisentraut
• 20:49   Re: controlling the location of server-side SSL files Peter Eisentraut
• 20:59   Re: backup_label during crash recovery: do we know how to solve it? Dimitri Fontaine
• 22:00   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_regress: Replace exit_nicely() with exit() plus atexit() hook Andrew Dunstan
• 22:58   Re: SQL:2011 features David E. Wheeler
• 22:59   Re: spinlocks on powerpc Manabu Ori
• 23:12   Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Simon Riggs