Re: SQL:2011 features - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: SQL:2011 features
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMJUcUUw64WHgnZyUs4zp4ueshUFXi221UQC_U2XAvjH-A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL:2011 features  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On mån, 2012-01-02 at 09:33 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Are there any features in SQL:2011 that we should be considering for 9.2?
>>
>> We seem quite close on temporal stuff, so maybe just a little syntax work?
>
> I am aware of this piece on what's new in SQL:2011:
> http://petereisentraut.blogspot.com/2010/04/news-from-sql-standard.html

I saw this as well, which seems quite different:


http://metadata-standards.org/Document-library/Documents-by-number/WG2-N1501-N1550/WG2_N1536_koa046-Temporal-features-in-SQL-standard.pdf

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe