Re: information schema/aclexplode doesn't know about default privileges - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: information schema/aclexplode doesn't know about default privileges
Date
Msg-id 1325479426.12911.10.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: information schema/aclexplode doesn't know about default privileges  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: information schema/aclexplode doesn't know about default privileges
Re: information schema/aclexplode doesn't know about default privileges
List pgsql-hackers
On sön, 2011-11-27 at 17:29 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > This ought to show EXECUTE privilege on the new function, but it
> > doesn't, because proacl is null, and nothing in the information schema
> > handles that specially.
>
> > I've pondered some ways to fix that.  One would be to add a variant of
> > aclexplode() that takes a parameter telling which catalog the acl datum
> > came from, and aclexplode() could then substitute the data received
> > acldefault() for null values.  The other way would be to handle this
> > entirely in the information schema SQL (either using some coalesce calls
> > or perhaps a UNION).  But that would mean duplicating the knowledge of
> > acldefault() in a second remote place.  So I'm thinking that handling it
> > in aclexplode() would be better.
>
> +1.  It would be a really bad idea for the acldefault() logic to be
> duplicated someplace else, especially in SQL code where grepping for the
> relevant macros wouldn't even find it.

I figured the best and most flexible way to address this is to export
acldefault() as an SQL function and replace

    aclexplode(proacl)

with

    aclexplode(coalesce(proacl, acldefault('f', proowner)))

where 'f' here is something that is mapped to ACL_OBJECT_FUNCTION
internally.  AFAICT, there is no existing way to map an SQL-accessible
quantity to the ACL_OBJECT_* symbols, so I'll just have to make
something up.

WIP patch is attached.  If there are no objections to this approach,
I'll finish it up.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL return value in after triggers
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: sorting operators in pg_dump