Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Date
Msg-id 28045.1325531678@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Um ... timings of what?

> Apologies for being terse, no problem to give a full explanation.

But you still didn't.  I wanted to know what those numbers were and how
they show that there's not a performance regression.  Presumably you
meant that some were "before" and some "after", but they were not so
labeled.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe