On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Um ... timings of what?
>
>> Apologies for being terse, no problem to give a full explanation.
>
> But you still didn't. I wanted to know what those numbers were and how
> they show that there's not a performance regression. Presumably you
> meant that some were "before" and some "after", but they were not so
> labeled.
All timings were "after" applying the patch. Since all of the tests
had very acceptable absolute values I didn't test without-patch.
Anyway, looks like we need to bin that and retest with new patch when it comes.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
