Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

4 August 2010

• 00:11   Re: Postgres as Historian Greg Smith
• 02:44   Re: GROUPING SETS revisited Pavel Stehule
• 04:56   Re: merge command - GSoC progress Boxuan Zhai
• 06:57   Re: Postgres as Historian Hardik Belani
• 07:47   Re: tracking inherited columns (was: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance) Yeb Havinga
• 08:40   Re: Develop item from TODO list Viktor Valy
• 09:22   Re: documentation for committing with git Heikki Linnakangas
• 09:22   Re: Synchronous replication Heikki Linnakangas
• 09:23   Re: merge command - GSoC progress Boxuan Zhai
• 10:32   Re: documentation for committing with git Robert Haas
• 10:34   Re: tracking inherited columns (was: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance) Robert Haas
• 10:39   Re: tracking inherited columns (was: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance) Yeb Havinga
• 10:41   Re: tracking inherited columns (was: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance) Robert Haas
• 10:53   Re: tracking inherited columns (was: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance) Yeb Havinga
• 10:58   Re: multibyte charater set in levenshtein function Alexander Korotkov
• 10:58   Re: multibyte charater set in levenshtein function Alexander Korotkov
• 10:58   Review of Synchronous Replication patches Kolb, Harald (NSN - DE/Munich)
• 11:39   Proposal / proof of concept: Triggers on VIEWs Dean Rasheed
• 11:58   Re: Patch to show individual statement latencies in pgbench output Florian Pflug
• 12:06   Re: Develop item from TODO list Bruce Momjian
• 12:10   Re: merge command - GSoC progress Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:23   Re: Proposal / proof of concept: Triggers on VIEWs Marko Tiikkaja
• 12:23   Re: merge command - GSoC progress Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:54   Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch Robert Haas
• 12:56   Re: tracking inherited columns (was: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance) Andrew Dunstan
• 13:00   Re: Review of Synchronous Replication patches Robert Haas
• 13:02   Re: merge command - GSoC progress Andres Freund
• 13:31   Re: Proposal / proof of concept: Triggers on VIEWs Dean Rasheed
• 13:34   Re: documentation for committing with git Robert Haas
• 13:35   Re: documentation for committing with git Heikki Linnakangas
• 13:38   Re: Synchronous replication Heikki Linnakangas
• 13:43   Re: Proposal / proof of concept: Triggers on VIEWs Marko Tiikkaja
• 13:50   Re: documentation for committing with git Andrew Dunstan
• 14:03   Re: Proposal / proof of concept: Triggers on VIEWs Dean Rasheed
• 14:08   Re: Proposal / proof of concept: Triggers on VIEWs Marko Tiikkaja
• 14:10   Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch David Fetter
• 14:29   Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch Robert Haas
• 14:35   Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch Pavel Stehule
• 14:37   Re: merge command - GSoC progress Simon Riggs
• 14:37   Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch Tom Lane
• 14:57   Re: Where in the world is Itagaki Takahiro? Itagaki Takahiro
• 15:06   Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Tom Lane
• 15:22   Re: tracking inherited columns (was: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance) Tom Lane
• 16:13   Re: merge command - GSoC progress Simon Riggs
• 16:17   Re: GROUPING SETS revisited Joshua Tolley
• 16:49   Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Robert Haas
• 16:55   Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Tom Lane
• 17:33   patch for contrib/isn Jan Otto
• 17:35   Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Robert Haas
• 17:56   Re: patch for contrib/isn Joshua D. Drake
• 18:41   Re: tracking inherited columns (was: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance) Yeb Havinga
• 18:47   Re: Rewrite, normal execution vs. EXPLAIN ANALYZE Tom Lane
• 18:57   Re: tracking inherited columns (was: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance) Tom Lane
• 18:58   Re: patch for contrib/isn Kevin Grittner
• 18:59   Re: Where in the world is Itagaki Takahiro? Josh Berkus
• 19:11   Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane
• 19:25   Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Alex Hunsaker
• 19:27   Re: Rewrite, normal execution vs. EXPLAIN ANALYZE Robert Haas
• 19:28   Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Robert Haas
• 19:31   Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane
• 19:33   Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Thom Brown
• 19:34   more numeric stuff Robert Haas
• 19:36   Re: patch for contrib/isn Robert Haas
• 19:43   Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane
• 19:44   Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Josh Berkus
• 19:48   Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane
• 19:48   Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Devrim GÜNDÜZ
• 19:50   Re: patch for contrib/isn Kevin Grittner
• 19:55   Re: Rewrite, normal execution vs. EXPLAIN ANALYZE Marko Tiikkaja
• 19:56   Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Alex Hunsaker
• 19:58   Re: Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Josh Berkus
• 20:03   Re: Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Thom Brown
• 20:07   Re: more numeric stuff Tom Lane
• 20:15   Re: Rewrite, normal execution vs. EXPLAIN ANALYZE Tom Lane
• 20:28   Re: Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) David Fetter
• 20:42   Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Merlin Moncure
• 21:09   Using Small Size SSDs to improve performance? Nilson
• 21:13   Re: ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname Kevin Grittner
• 22:20   Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane
• 22:34   Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Thom Brown
• 22:42   Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane
• 22:44   Two different methods of sneaking non-immutable data into an index Merlin Moncure
• 22:49   Re: Using Small Size SSDs to improve performance? Merlin Moncure
• 22:49   Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) David Fetter
• 22:57   Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Alex Hunsaker
• 23:00   Re: Two different methods of sneaking non-immutable data into an index Tom Lane
• 23:07   Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Tom Lane
• 23:17   Re: more numeric stuff Robert Haas
• 23:18   Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Robert Haas
• 23:19   Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Alex Hunsaker
• 23:19   Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: [BUGS] string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) Robert Haas
• 23:28   Re: more numeric stuff Tom Lane
• 23:43   Re: Two different methods of sneaking non-immutable data into an index Merlin Moncure
• 23:44   Re: Using Small Size SSDs to improve performance? Greg Smith