On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 16:33, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
> I was afraid that the function would be pulled completely, but from
> looking at the patch, you're only removing the function with a
> single-parameter signature, which is quite innocuous. So I'm "for"
> now.
Ahh, Now I see why you were worried about people calling you a witch :)
On another note, I do wonder if we could avoid more confusion by just
reordering the arguments. In-fact I bet the original argument
ordering was done precisely so it would match the 1 argument version.
I dunno about anyone else but (a, ',' order by a) just looks weird.
Or in other words, any thoughts on:
select string_agg(delim, expression);
I don't want to stretch this out, but while we are making changes...
