Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> writes:
> I was afraid that the function would be pulled completely, but from
> looking at the patch, you're only removing the function with a
> single-parameter signature, which is quite innocuous.
Yes, of course, sorry if I confused anyone. It's the combination of
having both one- and two-argument forms that is the problem. Since
the one-argument form isn't doing anything but offering a rather
useless default, we won't lose functionality if we pull it.
regards, tom lane
