Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: tracking inherited columns (was: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: tracking inherited columns (was: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance)
Date
Msg-id 19283.1280935244@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: tracking inherited columns (was: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance)  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: tracking inherited columns (was: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance)  (Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 08/04/2010 06:41 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Uh, really?  Wow.  You want to follow the inheritance hierarchy in
>> both directions, both down and up?  That seems like it could be
>> confusing.

> It seems more than confusing. It seems fundamentally wrong. It would 
> certainly be a violation of POLA.

I agree, this idea seems completely nuts.  It is *not* reasonable for
an action applied to a child to change the definition of the parent.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: merge command - GSoC progress