Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 08/04/2010 06:41 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Uh, really? Wow. You want to follow the inheritance hierarchy in
>> both directions, both down and up? That seems like it could be
>> confusing.
> It seems more than confusing. It seems fundamentally wrong. It would
> certainly be a violation of POLA.
I agree, this idea seems completely nuts. It is *not* reasonable for
an action applied to a child to change the definition of the parent.
regards, tom lane