Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

3 June 2010

• 00:28   Re: Allow wal_keep_segments to keep all segments Bruce Momjian
• 00:28   Re: Allow wal_keep_segments to keep all segments Bruce Momjian
• 00:47   Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay Stephen Frost
• 01:06   Re: ALTER TABLE .... make constraint DEFERRABLE Bruce Momjian
• 01:07   Re: [BUGS] BUG #5487: dblink failed with 63 bytes connection names Takahiro Itagaki
• 01:08   Re: recovery getting interrupted is not so unusual as it used to be Florian Pflug
• 01:31   Re: recovery getting interrupted is not so unusual as it used to be Robert Haas
• 01:34   current value support Michael Paquier
• 01:34   Re: Comments on Exclusion Constraints and related datatypes Bruce Momjian
• 01:40   Re: Idea for getting rid of VACUUM FREEZE on cold pages Robert Haas
• 01:45   Re: Comments on Exclusion Constraints and related datatypes Bruce Momjian
• 01:47   Re: Comments on Exclusion Constraints and related datatypes Bruce Momjian
• 02:35   Re: recovery getting interrupted is not so unusual as it used to be Florian Pflug
• 02:38   Re: [RFC] A tackle to the leaky VIEWs for RLS KaiGai Kohei
• 03:26   Re: recovery getting interrupted is not so unusual as it used to be Robert Haas
• 04:01   Re: current value support Michael Paquier
• 04:36   Re: Allow wal_keep_segments to keep all segments Simon Riggs
• 07:43   Re: How to pass around collation information Peter Eisentraut
• 07:57   Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay Simon Riggs
• 08:33   Re: ALTER TABLE .... make constraint DEFERRABLE Dean Rasheed
• 08:45   [PATCH] Fix leaky VIEWs for RLS KaiGai Kohei
• 08:53   Re: ALTER TABLE .... make constraint DEFERRABLE Simon Riggs
• 08:56   Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay Fujii Masao
• 09:08   Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay Simon Riggs
• 09:18   Re: "caught_up" status in walsender Fujii Masao
• 09:39   Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay Fujii Masao
• 10:41   Re: Idea for getting rid of VACUUM FREEZE on cold pages Greg Stark
• 10:58   Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay Simon Riggs
• 11:32   rfc: changing documentation about xpath Denis I. Polukarov
• 12:04   Re: rfc: changing documentation about xpath Andrew Dunstan
• 12:15   Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay Fujii Masao
• 12:15   Re: Allow wal_keep_segments to keep all segments Bruce Momjian
• 12:31   Re: How to pass around collation information David Christensen
• 12:31   Re: Allow wal_keep_segments to keep all segments Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:36   Re: Allow wal_keep_segments to keep all segments Bruce Momjian
• 13:37   PITR Recovery Question Gnanakumar
• 13:47   Re: "caught_up" status in walsender Tom Lane
• 14:11   Re: Allow wal_keep_segments to keep all segments Bruce Momjian
• 14:16   Re: ALTER TABLE .... make constraint DEFERRABLE Bruce Momjian
• 14:22   Re: Allow wal_keep_segments to keep all segments Tom Lane
• 14:42   Re: How to pass around collation information Peter Eisentraut
• 14:54   Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2? Tom Lane
• 15:13   Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay Greg Stark
• 15:18   Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature Bruce Momjian
• 15:19   Re: PITR Recovery Question Florian Pflug
• 15:25   Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2? Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:26   Re: "caught_up" status in walsender Tom Lane
• 15:29   Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature Tom Lane
• 15:30   Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2? Robert Haas
• 15:35   Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay Tom Lane
• 15:36   Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature Bruce Momjian
• 15:44   Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay Greg Stark
• 15:44   Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature Robert Haas
• 15:46   Re: How to pass around collation information Robert Haas
• 15:46   Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature Bruce Momjian
• 15:51   Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature Dimitri Fontaine
• 15:56   Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature Tom Lane
• 16:04   Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature David E. Wheeler
• 16:05   Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature David E. Wheeler
• 16:06   Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature Bruce Momjian
• 16:16   Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature Bruce Momjian
• 16:16   Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2? Tom Lane
• 16:34   9.0 release notes Bruce Momjian
• 16:40   Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2? Heikki Linnakangas
• 16:48   Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay Tom Lane
• 16:59   Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay Tom Lane
• 17:00   Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2? Tom Lane
• 17:19   Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay Simon Riggs
• 17:23   Re: [pgsql-hackers] Daily digest v1.10705 (13 messages) Marc Munro
• 17:27   Re: 9.0 release notes Josh Berkus
• 17:33   Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay Tom Lane
• 17:47   Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay Simon Riggs
• 18:07   Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2? Florian Pflug
• 19:16   Re: Allow wal_keep_segments to keep all segments Alvaro Herrera
• 19:36   Re: Allow wal_keep_segments to keep all segments Bruce Momjian
• 19:47   Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay Greg Stark
• 19:47   Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay Tom Lane
• 19:58   Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user Jan Wieck
• 20:05   Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user Bruce Momjian
• 20:12   Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user Kevin Grittner
• 20:17   clarification on walsender protocol document Tom Lane
• 20:43   Re: clarification on walsender protocol document Heikki Linnakangas
• 21:11   Re: clarification on walsender protocol document Tom Lane
• 21:16   Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user Jan Wieck
• 21:31   Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user Chris Browne
• 21:31   Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user Chris Browne
• 21:32   Re: Allow wal_keep_segments to keep all segments Andrew Dunstan
• 21:58   Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user Greg Stark
• 22:03   Re: SET CONSTRAINTS todo Dan Colish
• 22:18   Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user Kevin Grittner
• 22:22   Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2? Tom Lane
• 22:24   Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user Kevin Grittner
• 22:29   Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user Bruce Momjian
• 22:31   Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user Bruce Momjian
• 22:49   Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay Simon Riggs
• 23:02   Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay Tom Lane
• 23:11   Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user Alvaro Herrera
• 23:21   Re: 9.0 release notes Josh Berkus
• 23:27   SET CONSTRAINTS todo Dan Colish
• 23:56   Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user Jan Wieck
• 23:57   Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user Jan Wieck