Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinAKcoyDYip7zL8Xv9STuTh5YdywSAAvQndp4iW@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I don't understand why you want to use a different delay when you're
> restoring from archive vs. when you're streaming (what about existing WAL
> files found in pg_xlog, BTW?). The source of WAL shouldn't make a
> difference.

Yes. The pace of a recovery has nothing to do with that of log shipping.
So to hurry up a recovery when restoring from archive seems to be useless.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE .... make constraint DEFERRABLE
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay