Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?
Date
Msg-id 20697.1275603713@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?  (Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>)
Responses Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> writes:
> On Jun 3, 2010, at 19:00 , Tom Lane wrote:
>> Maybe we should just get rid of the hint.

> FYI, Robert Haas suggested the same in the thread that lead to this patch being applied. The arguments against doing
thatis that a real crash during recovery *is* something to be quite alarmed about.
 

After some discussion among core we're going to leave it as-is.  Anybody
who doesn't want to initdb for beta2 can test out pg_upgrade ;-)
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user