On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Jan Wieck <JanWieck@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I'm puzzled how you would define this value. How do you add 7 inserts,
>> 7 deletes, and 7 updates? Is that 21 rows modified?
>
> I actually have a hard time understanding why people are so opposed to a
> feature that has zero impact at all unless a DBA actually turns in ON. What
> is the problem with exposing the commit order of transactions?
The post you were responding to was regarding the meaninglessness of
the "number of records" attribute you wanted. Your response is a non
sequitor.
I think the commit order of transactions would be a good thing to
expose though I've asked repeatedly what kind of interface you need
and never gotten answers to all the questions.
--
greg
