Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

13 August 2009

• 02:51   Re: [PATCH] pgbench: new feature allowing to launch shell commands Michael Paquier
• 03:19   Re: schemapg.h Alvaro Herrera
• 07:00   Re: machine-readable explain output v4 Greg Smith
• 07:41   Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status Greg Smith
• 08:14   Geometry RESTRICT and JOIN Paul Matthews
• 08:41   Re: Alpha 1 release notes Dimitri Fontaine
• 09:19   Re: Alpha 1 release notes Massa, Harald Armin
• 09:59   Re: COPY speedup Pierre Frédéric Caillaud
• 10:35   FDW-based dblink Itagaki Takahiro
• 10:48   trigger functions can only be called as triggers Peter Eisentraut
• 11:01   Re: FDW-based dblink Heikki Linnakangas
• 11:33   Re: DECLARE doesn't set/reset sqlca after DECLARE cursor Michael Meskes
• 12:27   Re: surprising trigger/foreign key interaction Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 14:03   Re: surprising trigger/foreign key interaction Alvaro Herrera
• 14:09   Re: Filtering dictionaries support and unaccent dictionary Robert Haas
• 14:09   Re: Alpha 1 release notes Alvaro Herrera
• 14:13   Re: dependencies for generated header files Robert Haas
• 14:23   Re: FDW-based dblink Alvaro Herrera
• 14:26   Re: Alpha 1 release notes Peter Eisentraut
• 14:35   Re: Alpha 1 release notes Tom Lane
• 14:37   Re: trigger functions can only be called as triggers Tom Lane
• 14:54   Re: schemapg.h Tom Lane
• 14:57   Re: Filtering dictionaries support and unaccent dictionary Oleg Bartunov
• 15:02   Re: Geometry RESTRICT and JOIN Tom Lane
• 15:05   Re: Alpha 1 release notes Alvaro Herrera
• 15:08   Re: Filtering dictionaries support and unaccent dictionary Alvaro Herrera
• 15:08   Re: Alpha 1 release notes Tom Lane
• 15:29   Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status Kevin Grittner
• 15:56   Re: DECLARE doesn't set/reset sqlca after DECLARE cursor Boszormenyi Zoltan
• 16:08   Re: Implementation of GROUPING SETS (T431: Extended grouping capabilities) Hitoshi Harada
• 16:22   Re: Implementation of GROUPING SETS (T431: Extended grouping capabilities) Олег Царев
• 17:00   Re: Implementation of GROUPING SETS (T431: Extended grouping capabilities) Pavel Stehule
• 17:05   Re: Implementation of GROUPING SETS (T431: Extended grouping capabilities) Hitoshi Harada
• 17:05   Re: Implementation of GROUPING SETS (T431: Extended grouping capabilities) Pavel Stehule
• 17:11   Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status Josh Berkus
• 17:17   Re: surprising trigger/foreign key interaction Josh Berkus
• 17:30   Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status Tom Lane
• 17:31   Re: COPY speedup Pierre Frédéric Caillaud
• 17:36   Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status Josh Berkus
• 17:44   Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status Tom Lane
• 17:50   Re: Implementation of GROUPING SETS (T431: Extended grouping capabilities) Hitoshi Harada
• 17:56   Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status Josh Berkus
• 18:09   Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status Tom Lane
• 18:09   Re: Implementation of GROUPING SETS (T431: Extended grouping capabilities) Pavel Stehule
• 18:26   Re: FDW-based dblink David Fetter
• 18:31   Re: Filtering dictionaries support and unaccent dictionary Peter Eisentraut
• 18:49   Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status Josh Berkus
• 19:04   Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status Andrew Dunstan
• 19:14   Re: Filtering dictionaries support and unaccent dictionary Bruce Momjian
• 19:25   Re: Alpha 1 release notes Bruce Momjian
• 20:20   Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status Jaime Casanova
• 21:32   freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Jeff Davis
• 21:33   Getting rid of the flat authentication file Tom Lane
• 21:58   Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Alvaro Herrera
• 22:17   [PERFORM] Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age100m? ) Kevin Grittner
• 22:20   Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Jeff Davis
• 22:24   Re: [PERFORM] Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age100m? ) Jeff Davis
• 22:25   Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Robert Haas
• 22:35   Re: [PERFORM] Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Josh Berkus
• 22:46   Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Tom Lane
• 23:00   Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Jeff Davis
• 23:06   Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Tom Lane
• 23:08   Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Josh Berkus
• 23:16   Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Josh Berkus
• 23:19   pg_hba.conf: samehost and samenet Stef Walter
• 23:20   Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Jeff Davis
• 23:20   Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Jeff Davis
• 23:22   Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Tom Lane
• 23:22   Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Greg Stark
• 23:31   Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Greg Stark